One of the most common questions we see is:
“Can a trading bot actually pass and survive a prop firm?”
Short answer: Yes — but only if it’s built and used correctly.
Long answer… that’s what this discussion is for.
⚠️ Where Most Bots Fail Prop Firms
From experience and shared stories, most bots fail because of:
-
❌ Over-leveraging on small accounts
-
❌ No daily drawdown control
-
❌ Martingale or recovery logic
-
❌ Too many correlated pairs open at once
-
❌ Ignoring news volatility
-
❌ Chasing fast targets instead of consistency
Prop firms don’t just test profitability — they test discipline and risk control.
✅ What Actually Makes a Bot Prop-Firm Safe
A bot can be prop-firm safe when it:
-
Uses fixed or capped risk per trade
-
Limits max simultaneous positions
-
Trades high-liquidity sessions only
-
Respects daily and max drawdown rules
-
Has logic to pause after losses
-
Avoids gambling-style recovery trades
Consistency > speed.
🧠 Manual Traders vs Bot Traders — Who Has the Edge?
Manual traders:
-
Can adapt quickly
-
Can avoid bad market conditions
-
But struggle with discipline
Bot traders:
-
Are emotionless
-
Execute perfectly
-
But only as good as their logic
The strongest approach many use?
👉 Bots with strict rules + human oversight.
💬 Let’s Open the Discussion
We want to hear from you:
-
Have you passed or failed a prop firm using a bot?
-
What rule caused the most trouble for you?
-
Do you trust bots more on one pair or multiple pairs?
-
Do you pause bots during news events?
Share real experiences — wins or losses.
That’s how everyone here levels up.
📌 Final Thought
Prop firms reward traders who:
-
Respect risk
-
Control exposure
-
Think long-term
Whether manual or automated, your edge is discipline.
Drop your thoughts below 👇
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!